More Tennessee National Guardsmen reached out to The Tennessee Star on Friday in order to rebut the coordinated messaging between TN-5 candidate and former National Guard General Kurt Winstead and Governor Bill Lee on the issue of soldier firings due to a COVID-19 mandate and the role that the governor can play.
The deadline for soldiers to comply with the mandate has now passed.
“It’s a coordinated message. Look at the timing and the content of the message. Winstead goes on the radio and says one thing and then two hours later Bill Lee says basically the same thing on the same station. There’s no way they are not coordinating their message, in my opinion.” said a guardsman.
Both Lee and Winstead have placed the blame squarely at the federal level, insisting there is very little that the Tennessee governor can do to stop the firings.
All of Lee’s publicly available statements have been a variation of the message sent to legislators and later on, the media.
We take seriously the religious and personal exemptions requested by members who are not part of the 93% who are vaccinated in accordance with DoD policy. We have no plans to terminate these members based on their status and have asked DoD to approve their individual exemption requests.
The Star previously reported Winstead said on WTN, “They have the purse strings, Matt. The federal government pays, through the National Guard, all the National Guardsmen, all the Reservists, all the active Army are paid through the federal government. The purse strings are owned by the federal government. That’s why this is a difficult situation. It’s not a decision that the governor can make.”
“What Winstead failed to mention (and knows full well) is that while the federal government does fund the National Guard, the control of those troops belongs to the state, and the governor is their Commander in Chief unless they are deployed overseas,” another Tennessee National Guard member told The Star.
“This is the sin of omission and that makes it a blatant lie,” stated a frustrated member. “He has commanded thousands of troops and there is no way he doesn’t understand the law regarding Title 32.”
There are three ways that a National Guardsman can serve and be compensated:
1 –State Active Duty (or SAD) Orders
These orders are typically used for short-term responses like local disasters or state emergencies like tornado response, civil unrest support, and were even used in the National Guard’s effort to combat COVID-19 in 2020-2021. Under these orders, the state provides all funding and control. There is no federal contribution or oversight.
2 – Title 10 Orders
Title 10 orders are under the statute under which all active duty service members serve, including all of those that are in the Reserves for all branches (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard, Space Force). Under these orders, the Department of Defense provides all funding and control.
The Tennessee National Guard only falls under Title 10 during a federal activation, typically for overseas deployments.
3 – Title 32 Orders
Title 32 orders apply exclusively to the National Guard. It is the status under which they serve most of their time, including weekend drills, annual training, and schools. Under Title 32 status, the National Guard remains under “the command and control of their respective governors but is funded by the Department of Defense (DoD)”.
“It’s infuriating that both General Winstead and Governor Lee refuse to confirm that the governor has the control and authority over his Title 32 troops and can dispatch Attorney General Slatery to file a lawsuit and get an injunction to stop this,” a guard officer said.
“In my opinion, this makes both Lee’s and Winstead’s integrity look questionable. The people of Tennessee need to hold Lee accountable and the people in Tennessee’s 5th Congressional District need to know what they are getting from Winstead if they vote for him,” the officer added.
– – –
Aaron Gulbransen is a reporter at The Tennessee Star and The Star News Network. Email tips to [email protected]. Follow Aaron on GETTR, Twitter, Truth Social, and Parler.
Photo “Bill Lee” by Gov. Bill Lee. Photo “Kurt Winstead” by Kurt Winstead for Congress. Background Photo “Tennessee National Guard” by Tennessee National Guard.
This governor will not stand up for the men under his command. How will the people of tennessee count on this governor to represent them? This governor blames others for his failure to act.
It is a violation of the oath a soldier takes to refuse a lawful order.
They should be dishonorably discharged and lose all future benefits.
You’re a soldier not a civil rights demonstrator, act like it.
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. What rock do you sleep under?
Court says military must get consent for anthrax vaccinations – John Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, — F.Supp.2d —-, 2003 WL 22994225 (D.D.C. Dec 22, 2003)
A soldier takes an oath to uphold the Constitution. Being a soldier does not mean loosing natural rights or being excluded from the protections of the US Constitution. If that were the case,then there would be no such thing as a “lawful order.” There would only be “orders.” But members of the Armed forces are not animals or slaves. They remain citizens under the Constitution entitled to rights under the Constituion.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (French: Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen de 1789), set by France’s National Constituent Assembly in 1789, is a human civil rights document from the French Revolution.[1] Inspired by Enlightenment philosophers, the Declaration was a core statement of the values of the French Revolution and had a major impact on the development of popular conceptions of individual liberty and democracy in Europe and worldwide.[2]
“When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation, since the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Money has no motherland; financiers are without patriotism and without decency; their sole object is gain.”
― Napoleon Bonaparte
Replace the word “bankers” with “BIg Pharma” and it’s the same thing.
Is Bill Lee really a Democrat—maybe a conservative Democrat, but a Democrat nevertheless? Is Bill Lee a guy who just said that he was a Republican because he knew four/five years ago that he would NEVER be elected governor in Tennessee in ‘today’s’ political climate if he ran as what he really was, a Democrat?
I suppose that people have now noticed that in the upcoming August statewide gubernatorial primary, Governor Lee has NO Republican opposition.
“. . .the people of TN’s 5th Congressional District need to know what they are getting from Winstead if they vote for him.” You mean the guy who financially supported the Democratic Party through adulthood until about 2010 when it became obvious that the Republicans were the future in this state and he was approaching retirement and might want to buy a seat in Congress so he became a Republican. One thing for sure, he doesn’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing because he is a veritable weathervane. Know what you are getting from General Weathervane? NOT A CHANCE!
Go Stuart!
Spot on analysis.
But what may make Winstead the member of congress from CD5 is his warchest and the lack of a primary runoff in TN. This formula probably gave us Governor Lee
I think Winstead would probably vote the way we want most of the time but I would also be waiting for a “Lindsey Graham moment.”